Vol. 9 No. 1 (2022): Αποτυπώσεις - Ανασχεδιασμοί
Articles

Making/Re‐making: representational devices of creation

Categories

Published 2025-10-15

Keywords

  • πράττειν,
  • ανακατασκευή,
  • αναπαράσταση,
  • εργαλεία,
  • τεχνικές,
  • δημιουργικότητα
  • ...More
    Less

How to Cite

Eleni Vlachonasiou. (2025). Making/Re‐making: representational devices of creation. CHORO-grafies, 9(1), 010-017. https://doi.org/10.5281/he927x30

Abstract

This paper attempts an evaluation of the colloquium titled “Making/Re‐making” which initiated a discussion that looked for cross sections and common fields across various forms of art and engineering. The concept of “making” is embedded in the approach to any form of creativity, ranging from architectural design to artistic composition, construction and crafting, focusing on instances of re‐creation, re‐design and re‐construction, viewing them as agents for the reflection on space. The colloquium aimed to highlight different approaches to “re‐making” that draw a mosaic of spatial intentions and scientific understandings forming a common field for engineers and artists. From this point of view “making” is transformed from an agent of realization to a generative tool that activates new narratives, highlights collectiveness, recalls memories and produces unexpected connotations and spatial experiences.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

  1. Mario Carpo in Conversation with Matthias Kohler, in: Fabricate 2014: Negotiating Design & Making, Gramazio,F., Kohler, M., Langenberg, S., 2014, pp. 12‐21
  2. ibid.
  3. Gropius, W. Program of the Staatlich Bauhus in Weimar, 1919. In: https://bauhausmanifesto.com/, last accessed 6/7/22
  4. Making learners: A Framework for Evaluating Making in STEM Education, Marshal, J., Harron, J., Interdisciplinary Journal of problem‐based learning, Vol. 12, issue 12, September 2018. Available at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol12/iss2/3/
  5. Lessons from The Maker Movement, MIT Sloan Management Review, Singh, S. March 2018, in: https://sloanreview.mit.edu/article/lessons‐from‐the‐maker‐movement/, last accessed 6/7/22
  6. The Maker Movement: a Learning Revolution, ISTE, Martinez, S., February 2019. In https://www.iste.org/explore/In‐the‐classroom/The‐maker‐movement‐A‐learning‐revolution, last accessed 6/7/22
  7. STEM: abbreviation for Science, Engineering, Technology, Mathematics
  8. Making learners: A Framework for Evaluating Making in STEM Education, Marshal, J., Harron, J., Interdisciplinary Journal of problem‐based learning, Vol. 12, issue 12, September 2018. Available at: https://docs.lib.purdue.edu/ijpbl/vol12/iss2/3/, last accessed 6/7/22
  9. Nothing But the Real Thing: Considerations on Copies, Remakes and Replicas, Beerkens, L., Tate Papers, Automn 2007. In: https://www.tate.org.uk/research/tate‐papers/08/nothing‐but‐the‐real‐thing‐considerations‐on‐copies‐remakes‐and‐replicas‐in‐modern‐art], last accessed 6/7/22
  10. Remaking Dürer: Investigating the Master Engravings by Masterful Engraving, Raftery, A., Campbell, A. , Art in Print, Volume 2, Number 4, November‐December 2012, pp 15‐21. In (https://artinprint.org/article/remaking‐durer‐investigating‐the‐master‐engravings/), last accessed 6/7/22
  11. Appropriation in Contemporary Art, Rowe, H.A, Inquiries Journal, Vol.3, No 6, 2011. Available at: http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/articles/1661/appropriation‐in‐contemporary‐art
  12. Art Theory: Appropriation, Gemmel, M., Arts Help, 2020. In: (https://www.artshelp.net/art‐theory‐appropriation/) last accessed 6/7/22
  13. How does thinking relate to tool making, Malafouris, L., Adaptive Behavior, Vol 29(20, pp.107‐121, 2021. In: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1059712320950539, last accessed 6/7/22.
  14. How Our Cognition Shapes and is Shaped by Technology: A Common Framework for Understanding Human Tool‐Use Interactions in the past, present and Future, Osiurak, F., Navarro, J., Reynaud, E., Frontiers in Psychology, 9:239, March 2018. In: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00293 last accessed 6/7/22
  15. How does thinking relate to tool making, Malafouris, L., Adaptive Behavior, Vol 29(20, pp.107‐121, 2021. In: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1059712320950539, last accessed 6/7/22.
  16. The Scene of the Screen: Envisioning Cinematic, Photographic and Electronic “Presence’, Sobchack, V., in POST‐Cinema: Theorizing 21st century Film., eds Denson, S., Leyda, J., Reframe Books, 2016. Available online at:[https://reframe.sussex.ac.uk/post‐cinema/2‐1‐sobchack/].
  17. Techniques of the Representation of Space and Morphogenesis: effects of Digital Design Tools in Architecture, Vlachonasiou, E., PhD, AUTH, 2012, p.228‐9.
  18. Creativity: the ability to make or otherwise bring into existence something new, whether a new solution to a problem, a new method or device, or a new artistic object or form. In: https://www.britannica.com/topic/creativity, last accessed 6/7/22.
  19. What is creativity, Foster, R., Yale Insights, February 2015, In: https://insights.som.yale.edu/insights/what‐is‐creativity last accessed 6/7/22.
  20. ] The Creative Process: Reflections on the Invention in the Arts and Sciences, ed. Brewster, G., University of California Press, 1985, p.2.
  21. Representations can be classified into two types: descriptive and depictive. Here we are focusing on the depictive type of representation as we are mainly dealing with concepts of space. For further reading see: Schnotz, Wolfgang & Baadte, C. & Müller, Andreas & Rasch, R.. (2010). “Creative Thinking and Problem Solving with Depictive and Descriptive Representations.”
  22. A pragmatic perspective on visual representation and creative thinking, Martin, L., Schwartz, D.L., Visual Studies, 29:1, 2014, pp 80‐93. In http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2014.862997, last accessed 6/7/22.
  23. Intuitive Tools for Innovative Thinking, The International Handbook on Innovation, Root‐Bernstein, R., Root‐Bernstein, M., 2011. DOI:10.1016/B978‐008044198‐6/50026‐7
  24. Creativity in Science, Goodenough, Ursula W., Biology Faculty Publications & Presentations, 9‐1993. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/bio_facpubs/90, last accessed 6/7/22.
  25. What is the Common Ground between art and Science? And how is Beethoven like Darwin?, McEwan, I, Arkani‐Hamed, N,. The Guardian, 17 November, 2013. In: https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/nov/17/art‐science‐ian‐mcewan‐nima‐arkani‐hamed, last accessed 6/7/22.
  26. Finding common ground in arts‐science, Lucas, C., The Lancet, July 2018, https://doi.org/10.1016/S2352‐3018(18)30146‐2, last accessed 6/7/22.
  27. The works echo the theme of the inescapable destiny: Hanuu Lintu’s thoughts about Cavalleria Rusticana and Pagliacci, Interview by Petra Ronka, Ooppera Baletti, August 2021. Available in: https://oopperabaletti.fi/en/offstage/hannu‐lintus‐thoughts‐about‐cavalleria‐rusticana‐and‐pagliacci/, last accessed 6/7/22.
  28. Imaging architecture: the uses of photography in the practice of architectural history, Bordain, I., The Journal Of Architecture, October 2014. In: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13602360701217989, last accessed 6/7/22.
  29. Writing Architectural History: Evidence and Narrative in the Twenty0Fisrt Century, Abramson, D., Alexander, Z.C, Osman, M., University of Pittsburgh Press, 2021, pp3‐16. Available at https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv2269htv
  30. Architects have been trained to work with a variety of representational tools, knowing the affordances and limitations of each one, hoping that through their combinations, they will be able to convey as much information as possible, as agents of thinking and communication. For an overview of the role of representations in architecture see: Scheer, D.R., “Architectural Drawing: A Prospective Requiem”, ACADIA Regional 2011: Parametricism (SPC).
  31. Does Originality Still Exist? On Pushing the Boundaries of Architecture Representation, Anderson, a., Harvard University graduate School of Design, January 2022, in: https://www.gsd.harvard.edu/2022/01/on‐pushing‐the‐boundaries‐of‐architecture‐representation/, last accessed 6/7/22.